Skip to content 
The Statutory Best-Interest Factors, Explained
No single factor decides a case on its own. Judges weigh all of them together, but the factors tied to safety carry substantial weighted consideration ahead of the others.Which Party Is More Likely to Ensure the Child’s Safety
This factor looks at concrete safety practices, not just intentions. A parent who secures firearms properly, childproofs a home appropriately for the child’s age, and maintains a stable, supervised environment demonstrates this factor in a way a court can actually see.Present and Past Abuse
Courts consider documented abuse by a party or a household member, including relevant protection from abuse orders, even if the abuse was not directed at the child. A documented history of domestic violence in the home carries weight independent of whether the child witnessed it directly.Violent or Assaultive Behavior
This factor covers a pattern of violent conduct by a parent, including behavior outside the relationship with the co-parent, such as an assault charge involving a third party. A single, decades-old incident is weighed differently than a recent or repeated pattern.Cooperation and Conflict Between the Parties
Courts look at which parent supports the child’s relationship with the other parent, and which parent creates unnecessary conflict. A parent who facilitates video calls during the other parent’s away time, or who accommodates a reasonable schedule change, is viewed differently than one who cancels time out of spite or blocks communication.Each Party’s Parenting Duties, Past and Present
This factor rewards a demonstrated track record, not a stated intention. A court will look at who has actually handled school pickups, doctor’s appointments, homework help, and daily routines, since that history is the clearest evidence of how caregiving will likely continue.The Need for Stability and Continuity
Courts weigh how a proposed arrangement affects the child’s school, friendships, and community ties. Keeping a child in the same school district near existing relationships generally favors continuity over a change that disrupts those connections, absent a strong reason for the move.The Child’s Sibling and Family Relationships
Pennsylvania courts generally favor keeping siblings together rather than splitting them between households, since sibling relationships are considered an important part of a child’s support system.The Child’s Well-Reasoned Preference
A child’s preference matters, but its weight depends on the child’s maturity and the reasoning behind it. An older teenager’s clearly articulated wish to stay near their school and friend group carries far more weight than a young child expressing a preference shaped by which household has fewer rules.Proximity of the Parties’ Residences
Distance between homes shapes what schedules are realistic. Parents living ten minutes apart can reasonably share a school-week custody schedule that would be impractical for parents living an hour or more apart.Each Party’s Availability for Child Care
Courts consider work schedules and the actual child care plan behind them. A parent who works nights but has a reliable, consistent child care arrangement is viewed differently than a parent whose plan changes case by case.History of Drug or Alcohol Abuse
A documented history of substance abuse by a party or household member is weighed, particularly where there is evidence of a relapse pattern or an unaddressed, ongoing issue rather than a resolved one in the past.Mental and Physical Condition
Courts weigh a party’s or household member’s mental and physical condition as it actually affects caregiving capacity, not as a categorical disqualifier. An effectively treated and managed condition is viewed very differently than one left unaddressed.Any Other Relevant Factor
The list is not exhaustive. Courts can weigh any other circumstance genuinely relevant to the child’s well-being that does not fit neatly into the categories above.Why Safety Factors Carry Extra Weight
Act 8 of 2024, known as Kayden’s Law, amended 23 Pa.C.S. § 5328 to require Pennsylvania courts to give substantial weighted consideration to the safety-related factors ahead of the others, and to provide detailed written findings whenever custody or unsupervised time is granted despite evidence of past abuse. [2] If safety is genuinely at issue in your case, that evidence deserves to be developed early and presented clearly, not treated as one factor among many.How This Shapes Your Litigation Strategy
Knowing these factors before you file, not after a hearing is already scheduled, changes what evidence you gather and how you present your case. A parent who understands which factors actually move a judge spends less time on arguments that feel compelling emotionally but carry little statutory weight, and more time building a record on the factors that matter.Frequently Asked Questions
What determines child custody in Pennsylvania?
Pennsylvania courts decide custody based on the child’s best interests, weighing the statutory factors under 23 Pa.C.S. § 5328, with substantial weighted consideration given to any factor affecting the child’s safety.
What do judges look for in child custody cases in Pennsylvania?
Judges look at safety, any history of abuse or violence, each parent’s actual caregiving history, stability for the child, and the practical realities of each parent’s schedule and living situation, among the other statutory factors.
How hard is it to get full custody in Pennsylvania?
Sole physical custody is uncommon and usually reserved for situations involving safety concerns, since Pennsylvania law does not favor cutting a fit parent out of a child’s life. Most cases result in some form of shared arrangement.
What is the biggest mistake in a custody battle?
Focusing on arguments that feel emotionally compelling instead of evidence tied to the statutory factors a judge is actually required to weigh. Badmouthing the other parent rarely moves a case forward.
Build Your Case Around the Right Factors
Knowing the factors is one thing. Building a case that speaks directly to them is another. Our child custody page covers the full Lancaster County custody process, from filing through modification and enforcement.
At Lancaster Law Group, our family law attorneys help parents translate their family’s specific facts into the evidence that actually moves a Pennsylvania custody case.
Our Lancaster office is available for a confidential consultation. Call 717-358-0600 to get started today.
Sources
[1] 23 Pa.C.S. § 5328, Factors to consider when awarding custody | https://www.legis.state.pa.us/WU01/LI/LI/CT/HTM/23/00.053.028.000..HTM
[2] Act 8 of 2024 (Kayden’s Law), SB 55 summary | https://www.aclupa.org/legislation/sb-55-child-custody-proceedings-kaydens-law/
